My first song which i will be analysing is 'In my time of dying' by Bob Dylan (recorded in 1962 for his debut album), this song was then covered by Led Zeppelin on February 24th 1975. The instrumentation throughout Bob Dylan's version is very raw with just his guitar and vocals throughout the whole of the song compared to Led Zeppelin's version with their very lush instrumentation, including electric guitar, wailing vocals, thick, heavy drums and thumping bass.
Both are in a standard blues style with a slide guitar playing throughout the whole song. The way in which Dylan plays is very basic, with very sloppy playing, in which he very occasionally misses a note or doesn't complete a chord. The way in which jimmy page plays compared to this is very different, as he plays very elegant and slow. Here, Page lets the notes ring out. Led Zeppelin's version then progresses from a slow bluesy intro into a fairly hard rock song, with overdriven guitars and crashing, heavy drums, creating a very thick and dark sound. The Led Zeppelin version then later progresses into almost a jam session between the band and turns into a completely different song. This is also very different to Dylan's as the instrumentation doesn't progress at any point in the song.
The production also differs dramatically, with Dylan's being very bad quality and basic with no other instrumentation apart from his singing and guitar. Here, he lets some notes ring out louder than others and occasionally plays an incomplete chord. As stated before, the recording is very raw, however I personally feel that this captures the whole feel in the song as it sounds like it could have been recorded in the 1920's (with all of the classic blues artists like Robert Johnson). Their is also rumour that Bob Dylan was unprepared for the recording and used his girlfriends lipstick holder as a slide and turned down any second takes in order to save money.
This just proves that Bob Dylan was not very concerned about the production and instrumentation in the song, but rather just the message. Bob Dylan recorded this song at Columbia recording studios.
Unlike Led Zeppelin's version in which they were at the height of their careers, so they would have had the best equipment at their disposal. In my opinion, the production of this song is very good quality and still sounds as fresh today as the day i first heard it. Led Zeppelin recorded this cover at both 'Hedley grange' (a high quality studio in which both the Rolling Stones and Zeppelin recorded their songs) and olympic studios. The length of the song also differs dramatically between the two artists, with the Bob Dylan's being just a measly 2:39 compared to Led Zeppelin's at a massive 11:06.
bob dylans version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDOFFO9Bx3k
Led Zeppelins version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZgblTKscX0
'Mr Tambourine Man' by Bob Dylan (covered by The Byrd's)
My second song which i will be analysing is 'Mr Tambourine Man' by Bob Dylan (recorded on 15 January 1965 for his album 'Bring it all back home'), this song was then later covered by The byrds (on January 20th 1965). the original by Bob Dylan is again, very raw sounding with very basic instrumentation. Unlike The Byrd's cover, with great instrumentation to the whole song, almost creating a wall of sound for the listener. The instrumentation through out The Byrd's cover is also very well produced with some very jangly guitars and thick basslines. The drummer also holds the beat really well with it being steady and perfectly matching the styles that the guitars are playing.
Both songs are in completely different styles, with Bob Dylan's version being folk and The Byrd's version being early an form of psychedelic era of the 60s. the production style of The Byrd's version is very different to Bob Dylan's despite being recorded in the same studio just 5 days apart, with The Byrd's version being very lush and large sound with the reverbs and 12 string guitars used throughout the whole song. Unlike Bob Dylan's version, being very basic with next to no production techniques added to the song. The arrangement of the cover does not change, with it still being the same structure throughout the whole song. Both of the songs have a completely different running time with Bob Dylan's version being 5:29 and The Byrd's version being 2:18.
i couldn't find a studio version for this song due to youtube copyrights so i have a live performance instead
bob dylans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeP4FFr88SQ
The Byrd's cover: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyOzGPbn2tg
my third song that i will be analysing is 'twist and shout' written by The Top Notes (recorded in 1961) the song was then made famous by The Beatles for their album 'please please me' (recorded in 1963).
The version by The Beatles was composed in a sort of rock and roll style with the same kind of instrumentation as The Top Notes apart from the singing and the saxophone that is very prominent throughout. The singing done by The Top Notes was sung a lot faster than that of The Beatles. I personally prefer The Beatles style as they made it catchier than the original while still retaining the roots of the original songs. At the time of The Beatles recording, John Lennon was suffering from a severe cold. This gave the song an almost gravelly quality to his voice, which later made it onto the actual studio recording. i feel that this is one of the reasons why the song was so popular. Both songs have roughly the same running time with the Top Notes version running at 2:05 and The Beatles version running at 2:32.
The Top Notes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsDpc-8iR8g
The Beatles cover: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr7JFmKoSCA
I couldn't find a studio version for The Beatles due to youtube copyrights, so here is live version